![]() ![]() The three intrinsic paradoxes are expression–privacy, stability–change, and integration–separation. reported that focus group participants reported three discursive struggles that were displayed intrinsically using Facebook. For example, a person who describes needing both intimacy and space, and openness and privacy cannot be understood without the examination of the context the person is speaking in. The conflicting dialects as individual statements do not articulate the message the sender intended. When taken out of context, individual conflicting dialects lose their meaning. The founding concept of the relational dialectic communication theory is the contradicting interconnected dialects of individuals within a social context.Īnother major component of the relational dialectic communication theory is the totality or wholeness. In describing my love/hate opinion of rain to significant others, my dialect is a keen example of the contradictions that underlie the relational dialectic communication theory. ![]() I hate the cold, wet feeling of cold rain however, I love cuddling up and watching the rain. ![]() An example of the relational dialectic communication theory I have encountered in my life is my love/hate view of rainy days. Baxter describes her foundation of the theory as “I was struck by the contradictions, contingencies, non-realities and multiple realities” in her explanation of her first series of interviews discussing people's personal relationships. The Learning Module demonstrates the relational dialectic communication theory’s contradictory dialect on page 136 the first page of the chapter. Most participants describe being against the arranged marriage structure, yet they attend the arranged courtships in search of their “true love” (p. ![]() The study found six types of contradictions in the dialects of the participants. The article “From Strangers To Spouses: Early Relational Dialectics in Arranged Marriages Among Muslim Families in Lebanon” describes the modern hybrid arranged marriages in Lebanon’s Muslim families as illuminating examples of the relational dialectic communication theory. Participants reported “that the site is an important part of their life and also a source of significant problems” (Fox et al., p. Study participants reported that Facebook caused contradictory sentiments. conducted ten focus groups to examine the relational dialectic communication theory in social relationships. demonstrated the relational dialectic communication theory on social networking sites. The old proverbs “opposites attract” and “bird of one feather flock together” applied to the same individual’s description of their state of interpersonal relationships during the same conversation illustrate the contradictions’ explained by the relational dialectic communication theory.įox et al. Contradictions’ are the underling concept of the relational dialectic communication theory. One key component of the relational dialectic communication theory is contradicting dialect used to explain an individual’s contradicting needs in an intimate relationship. Later the conflicting patterns of dialect by individuals was refined to demonstrate the conflict of human wants and needs that underlie the conflicting patterns in interpersonal relationship communication. Her study asking interviewees about their personal intimate relationships yielded a disarray of conflicting results. The pattern of repeat tensions was first discovered when Baxter completed her first series of interviews. The theory originated with the work of Baxter and Montgomery began as their studies found repeated conflicting results. The theory explains conflicting needs an individual within a relationship can need or want and the conflicting dialect used to communicate that conflicting position. The theory examines the tensions expressed in dialects of individual parties in interpersonal relationships as individuals express the clash of conflicting wants and needs. The relational dialectic communication theory evaluates the tensions in relationships caused by human contradictions. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |